ASRock X870E Challenger Wifi Motherboard Review: A value X870E board packed with features
The latest all-white board to land on our test bench is from ASRock. But this time, it’s more affordable than the updated X870E Taichi White we recently covered. The $230 X870E Challenger Wifi White offers a surprising number of features for the price.
Specs-wise, the Challenger comes handsomely equipped for almost any price point. Features include a flagship audio codec, robust VRMs, and ample (and fast!) USB connectivity (including USB4 ports). You also get plenty of internal storage options, with four M.2 sockets (one PCIe 5.0) and two SATA ports, and fast networking with 5 GbE and Wi-Fi 7 (160MHz). Looking at other boards at this price, some don’t include USB4, offer slower 2.5 GbE, or provide weaker audio solutions. For $230, the Challenger is a great deal for an X870E-based board, though, like everything, it has drawbacks that we’ll cover below.
On the performance front, the X870E Challenger delivered average-to-below-average results across most tests, as we again had to use our secondary DDR5-6000 kit (the Kingston kit isn’t officially supported and didn’t work after enabling the XMP/DOCP profile). Still, we’re confident it would perform a bit better if you snag some RAM on the board’s QVL list that has tighter secondary and tertiary timings.Below, we’ll examine the X870E Challenger White’s performance and other features, and see if it earns a spot on our list of the best motherboards. But before we share test results and discuss details, here are the specifications from the ASRock website:
Specifications of the ASRock X870E Challenger Wifi White
Socket | AM5 (LGA 1718) |
Chipset | X870E |
Form Factor | ATX |
Voltage Regulator | 23 Phase (20x 110A SPS MOSFETs for Vcore) |
Video Ports | (2) USB4 |
USB Ports | (2) USB 4 (40 Gbps) Type-C (2) USB 2.0 (480 Mbps) |
Network Jacks | (1) 5 GbE |
Audio Jacks | (2) Analog and SPDIF |
Legacy Ports/Jacks | ✗ |
Other Ports/Jack | ✗ |
PCIe x16 | (1) v5.0 (x16) |
PCIe x8 | ✗ |
PCIe x4 | ✗ |
PCIe x1 | (1) v3.0 (x1) |
CrossFire/SLI | ✗ |
DIMM Slots | (4) DDR5-8200+(OC), 256GB Capacity |
M.2 Sockets | (1) PCIe 5.0 x4 (128 Gbps) / PCIe (up to 80mm) |
SATA Ports | (2) SATA3 6 Gbps |
USB Headers | (1) USB v3.2 Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps) Type-C |
Fan/Pump Headers | (7) 4-Pin (Accepts PWM and DC) |
RGB Headers | (3) 3-pin ARGB Gen2 headers |
Diagnostics Panel | 4 LED Post Status Checker |
Internal Button/Switch | ✗ |
SATA Controllers | ✗ |
Ethernet Controller(s) | (1) Realtek RTL8126 5 GbE |
Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | Realtek 8922AE Wi-Fi 7 - 160 MHz, 6 GHz, BT 5.4 |
USB Controllers | ASMedia ASM4242 |
HD Audio Codec | Realtek ALC4082 |
DDL/DTS | ✗ / ✗ |
Warranty | 3 Years |
Inside the Box
The retail packaging includes a few accessories to help you get up and running. You get the standard Wi-Fi antennas, two white SATA cables (one with a 90-degree connector), an installation guide, and some stickers. It’s not a lot, but par for the course in this price bracket.
Design and Features of the ASRock X870E Challenger Wifi White







The X870E Challenger Wifi White is, as the name describes, all white. In fact, everything save for two light-gray fan headers is white, along with the onboard chips and screws that secure the M.2 heatsinks to the 8-layer, server-grade PCB. Oversized VRM heatsinks cover the top-left part of the board, with Challenger written across them.
The bottom part of the board has a DIY-friendly, toolless multi-layer heatsink for the primary M.2 socket, plus basic plate-style heatsinks with screws for the M.2 sockets and dual promontory chipset. Overall, it’s a no-frills board (no integrated RGB lighting, even), so it lacks some of the larger plate-style heatsinks and ‘EZ latch features found on more expensive boards. You’ll need an all-white build to take advantage of the all-white look, but it’s still one of the better-looking white boards, especially for its price.

Starting in the top left corner, we see two “high-density” 8-pin EPS connectors (one required) to power the processor. Surrounding those are the two “XL” heatsinks to cool the flagship-class power delivery below. To the right of the socket are four DRAM slots with locking mechanisms on both sides. ASRock lists support up to DDR5-8200, which is plenty for the platform. Our Kingston kit didn’t want to play nice with this board, which makes this the third ASRock board that doesn’t support our base test kit. As always, stick to the memory QVL list for assured support.
Above the DRAM slots are the first three (of seven) 4-pin fan headers. Each header supports PWM- or DC-controlled devices and can be tweaked through the BIOS or ASRock’s Windows-based software. The CPU_FAN1 header supports up to 1A/12W output, while the rest support up to 3A/36W each. You should have plenty of headers and enough power.
Shifting focust to the right corner and moving down, the next feature is the 4-LED POST Status Checker. There are LEDs for the CPU, Boot, VGA, and RAM. During the POST process, these light up and, if there is a problem, the offending area’s LED stays lit, giving you a general idea of where the issue is. It’s not quite as helpful as the 2-character debug display on higher-end boards, but is a lot better than nothing and typical on a lower-priced motherboard.
Continuing down the edge, we spy two (of three) 3-pin ARGB headers, just above the main 24-pin ATX power connector. ASRock’s Polychrome Sync application controls the attached RGBs, offering several canned light patterns and adjustments. Last but not least is the front panel USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps) Type-C connector. If there’s one thing that stands out on this board, it’s the number and speed of the USB ports — there are a lot, and ASRock didn’t skimp on speed.

Power delivery on the X870E Challenger is one of the most robust we’ve seen, especially for a $230 budget-class motherboard. It comes with 23 total phases, 20 dedicated to Vcore. Power flows from the 8-pin EPS connectors to the Renesas RAA229628 20-phase PWM controller. From there, power heads to the more Renesas bits, this time the R2209004 110A SPS MOSFETs — a surprise to see on a board of this class. The 2,200A available will most certainly handle anything you throw at it. Flagship processors like the Ryzen 9 9950X or Ryzen 9 9950X3D2, overclocked even with extreme cooling methods, are also no problem.ALBM - board6 (bottom half):
On the bottom half of the board, we’ll start on the left where there’s a fully exposed audio solution that shows off the flagship Realtek ALC4082 codec, along with a couple of dedicated audio capacitors. While you won’t find a fancy integrated amplifier or DAC, this is the best codec for the platform and another pleasant surprise on such an inexpensive offering.
In the middle of the board are three PCIe slots. Two are full-length, and one is an open-ended x1-size slot. The top slot uses ASRock’s Reinforced Steel Slot, connects through the CPU, and is your PCIe 5.0 x16 slot (no bifurcation) for video cards. The second full-length slot at the bottom connects through the chipset and runs up to PCIe 3.0 x2, while the tiny x1 slot runs at PCIe 3.0 x1 speeds and also sources its bandwidth from the chipset. I’d like to see a PCIe 4.0 slot for extra bandwidth, but as-is it will easily support lower-bandwidth expansion needs.
Mixed among the PCIe slots, to the right of the chipset heatsink, sit four M.2 sockets. The top socket, under the large, tiered, DIY-friendly heatsink, is the one and only PCIe 5.0 x4 (128 Gbps) “Blazing” M.2 socket (M.2_1). M.2_2/3, which both run at PCIe 4.0 x4 (64 Gbps), are under the plate-style heatsink that’s secured with three captive screws. M.2_4 runs vertically along the right edge of the board and also supports PCIe 4.0 x4 drives. The good news is that the M.2 drives don't share lanes. You can pack the motherboard full of them, and each will run at full bandwidth without degrading or disabling another part. If your system needs a RAID setup on M.2, the board supports RAID0/1/10 modes. I wish there were more DIY-friendly features, but at this price, something has to give to keep prices low.
Hidden under the M.2 heatsink, along the right edge, is a 19-pin USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 Gbps) header and the two SATA ports (supports RAID0/1 modes). Finally, we've included a few images of the board's active ICs. ASRock uses a mix of ASMedia (USB4), Realtek (audio, networking), and Renesas for the power bits.





At the bottom are several headers, including front-panel audio and USB ports. A complete list of connectivity is listed below (from L to R):
- Front panel audio
- 4-pin RGB
- 3-pin ARGB
- (2) USB 2.0 headers
- (4) 4-pin fan headers
- 19-pin USB 3.2 Gen 1 header
- 2-pin Clear CMOS jumper
- Power LED and Speaker
- Front panel

Flipping the board around to the rear IO, you can see it’s chock-full of colorful USB and other ports. On the left are Clear CMOS and BIOS Flashback buttons. Next to those are the Wi-Fi 7 (remember, it’s ‘only’ 160 MHz) antenna connections and the HDMI (v2.1) port. Next to that are stacks of colored USB ports. In total, there are 12: two USB 4 (40 Gbps) Type-C ports that double as video outputs; five USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps), two of which are the Lightning USB ports (yellow, and designed to reduce latency by using different controllers). Three USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 Gbps) ports (purple) support USB PD 3.0 charging up to 5V@3A (15W). Lastly, the two USB 2.0 ports are black. Above one of the Type-C ports is the Realtek 5 GbE, and finally, on the right end, is the audio stack with two 3.5mm analog jacks and SPDIF outputs.
If you’re an esports gamer where every millisecond counts, the lighting gaming ports could come in handy. Otherwise, the feature adds little value for the average user.
MORE: Best Motherboards
MORE: How To Choose A Motherboard
MORE: Best Motherboard Deals
MORE: Best Motherboard Combo Deals
MORE: All Motherboard Content
Firmware
Like other X870E ASRock boards, the X870E Challenger starts in the informative Easy Mode, but it also lets you adjust several options (XMP, profiles, boot order, access to Fan-Tastic Tuning, etc.). The Challenger White uses a grey background and black characters, closely matching the new Taichi’s theme. The high contrast also makes it easy to read. The standard BIOS displays headings across the top, with subheadings and details below.
You can tweak anything here, as ASRock includes every option you can think of. Overclocking is straightforward, with most options readily available. The layout is logical, and the mouse movement is smooth. We have no significant complaints about the ASRock firmware, but it could certainly use a facelift if it wants to keep up with recent Asus, Gigabyte, and MSI updates.

























Software
ASRock offers several different software options. These include the App Shop, which lets users install drivers and software; the Nahimic 3 audio control panel; the A-Tuning application that lets you overclock and control fans; the Polychrome RGB software; and more. There’s also a Blazing OC Tuner, Motherboard Utility, and a convenient pop-up to install drivers when the system first boots. ASRock’s software gives users everything they need to manage and tweak their systems.








Test System / Comparison Products
We’ve updated our test system to Windows 11 (23H2) 64-bit OS with all updates applied as of late September 2024 (this includes the Branch Prediction Optimizations for AMD). Hardware-wise, we’ve updated the RAM kits (matching our Intel test system), cooling, storage, and video card. Unless otherwise noted, we use the latest publicly available non-beta motherboard BIOS. The hardware we used is as follows:
TEST SYSTEM COMPONENTS
- CPU - AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
- Cooling - Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420
- Storage - Crucial 2TB T705 M.2 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD
- RAM - Kingston Fury Beast DDR5-6000 CL36 (KF560C36BBEAK2-32)
Teamgroup T-Force Delta DDR5-7200 CL34 (FF3D518G7200HC34ABK)
Klevv Cras XR5 RGB DDR5-8000 (KD5AGUA80-80R380S) - GPU - Asus TUF RTX 4080 16G
- PSU - EVGA Supernova 850W P6
- Windows 11 64-bit (23H2 - 22631.4169)NVIDIA Driver 561.09
Sound | Integrated HD audio |
Network | Integrated Networking (GbE to 10 GbE) |
Graphics Driver | GeForce 561.09 |
Benchmark Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks and Settings | |
Procyon | Version 2.8.1352 64 Office 365, Video Editing (Premiere Pro 24.6.1), Photo Editing (Photoshop 25.1.2, Lightroom Classic 13.5.1) |
3DMark | Version 2.29.8294.0 64 Speed Way and Steel Nomad (Default) |
Cinebench R24 | Version 2024.1.0 |
Blender | Version 4.2.0 |
Application Tests and Settings | |
LAME MP3 | Version SSE2_2019 Mixed 271MB WAV to mp3: Command: -b 160 --nores (160Kb/s) |
HandBrake CLI | Version: 1.8.2 Sintel Open Movie Project: 4.19GB 4K mkv to x264 (light AVX) and x265 (heavy AVX) |
Corona 1.4 | Version 1.4 Custom benchmark |
7-Zip | Version 24.08 Integrated benchmark (Command Line) |
Game Tests and Settings | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | Ultra RT: - 1920 x 1080, DLSS - Balanced. |
F1 2024 | Ultra High Preset - 1920 x 1080, 16xAF/TAA, Great Britain (Clear/Dry), FPS Counter ON |
MORE: Best Motherboards
MORE: How To Choose A Motherboard
MORE: Best Motherboard Deals
MORE: Best Motherboard Combo Deals
MORE: All Motherboard Content
Benchmark Results
We run our standard benchmarks and power tests using the CPU’s stock frequencies (including any default boost/turbo) with all power-saving features enabled. We set optimized defaults in the BIOS and the memory by enabling the XMP profile. We set the Windows power scheme to Balanced (default) for this baseline testing, so the PC idles appropriately.
Synthetic Benchmarks
Synthetics offer a valuable way to evaluate a board's performance, as identical settings should yield similar results. Turbo boost wattage and advanced memory timings are areas where motherboard manufacturers can still optimize for stability or performance, though, and these settings can impact specific testing scenarios.














Starting with our synthetic benchmarks, the Challenger was average to below average in our tests, mostly due to the different timings in our secondary RAM kit. If we could run our primary kit, I’m confident performance would be closer to average across the board.
Timed Applications




Our timed applications told the same story. The board hit the slower of the two times in LAME and Corona, and was on the slower side of average in the Handbrake tests.
3D Games and 3DMark




Starting with the launch of Zen 5, we’ve updated our game tests. We’re keeping the F1 racing game but have upgraded to F1 24. We also dropped Far Cry 6 in favor of an even more popular game in Cyberpunk 2077. We run both games at 1920x1080 resolution using the Ultra preset (details listed above). Cyberpunk 2077 uses DLSS, while we left F1 24 on native resolution scaling.
The goal of these settings is to determine whether performance differs at the most commonly used (and CPU/system-bound) resolution, with settings most people use or strive for (Ultra). We expect the difference between boards in these tests to be minor, with most falling within the margin of error. We’ve also added a minimum FPS setting, which can affect your gameplay and immersion.
The Challenger did well in the synthetic 3DMark benchmarks, but was slower in games. Here again, we’re confident that if the secondary/tertiary memory timings were the same, results would be closer to average for Cyberpunk 2077 and perhaps higher for F1 24.
In short, there’s nothing to worry about regarding performance on this board.
Overclocking
Over the past few CPU generations, overclocking headroom has shrunk on both sides of the fence, while out-of-the-box potential has increased. For overclockers, that means less fun. For the average consumer, you’re getting the most out of the processor without manual tweaking. Today’s motherboards are more robust than ever and easily support power-hungry, flagship-class processors, so we know the hardware can handle them. There are multiple ways to extract even more performance from these processors: enabling a canned PBO setting, manually tweaking the PBO settings, or just going for an all-core overclock. Results will vary and depend on the cooling as well. In other words, your mileage may vary. Given all of the above, we will not overclock the CPU. However, we will test different memory kits to ensure they meet the specifications.


For memory testing, we start with our fastest non-clock driver kit: Klevv 32GB (2x16) DDR5-8000. Per usual on this platform, it booted to Windows but wouldn’t pass a stress test with our 9900X. The Team Group DDR5-7200 kit worked without issue. After dropping in the 8600G APU, that DDR5-8000 Klev kit worked just fine. These speeds are well past the ‘sweet spot’ for the AM5 platform, and with today’s RAM prices, few are buying such fast kits anyway. But it’s good to know the board can handle it.
Power Consumption / VRM Temperatures

We used AIDA64’s System Stability Test with Stress CPU, FPU, cache, and Memory enabled for power testing, using the processor's peak power consumption value. We obtained the wattage reading from the wall using a Kill-A-Watt meter, which captures the entire PC (excluding the monitor). The only variable that changes is the motherboard; all other parts remain the same. Please note that we now use only the stock power-use/VRM temperature charts, as this section aims to ensure the power delivery can handle flagship-class processors.
Stress testing this board with our DDR5-7200 kit showed it using less power than most. At idle, it sat around 78W, below average, and it peaked at 265W, slightly above average. This averages out to 162W, about 10W better than the running 172W average among our tested boards.


VRM temperatures were quite good during our testing, peaking at just over 47 degrees Celsius on our sensor and 53 degrees on the hottest internal sensor. With 110A MOSFETs pushing ~150W loads, it’s a solid result with plenty of headroom left for a more powerful processor and/or overclocking.
Bottom Line

Overall, the ASRock X870E Challenger Wifi White ($229.99) is an excellent and well-rounded budget X870E board. From the overbuilt power delivery and flagship audio codec to the copious number and speed of the USB ports, there’s a lot to like here, including the all-white aesthetic that’s sure to look good in a white build. Just add RGBs for additional bling, if that’s your thing.
Compared to others around this price point, like the Gigabyte X870E Eagle Wifi7 ($239.99), MSI’s Pro X870E-S Evo Wifi ($219.99), and the Asus TUF Gaming X870E-Plus Wifi7 ($289.99 (Asus’ least expensive X870E), the Challenger Wifi offers a better audio codec, a more robust VRM solution, more USB ports, and all M.2 sockets have a heatsink, whereas the competitors do not. You can step down to X870, but you lose bandwidth and bring the potential for lane sharing among USB, PCIe, and M.2 sockets.
In the end, the ASRock X870E Challenger Wifi is one of the best-equipped AMD boards around its $230 price point. If you’re sad because it’s white, don’t fret, as the black X870E Challenger Wifi is the same price. If you’re in the market for a new motherboard or want to jump into the AM5 platform with lots of features but don't have the budget for a more mid-range board, the X870E Challenger Wifi fits the bill and is one of the best X870E motherboards around.
MORE: Best Motherboards
MORE: How To Choose A Motherboard
MORE: Best Motherboard Deals
MORE: Best Motherboard Combo Deals
MORE: All Motherboard Content